Blogrolling On II
Recall that binary trees satisfied the Catalan relation , whereas Schroeder numbers, or Motzkin numbers, satisfy the substitution rule . In this paper, Cossali studies a generalisation of the generating function for the Catalan numbers . Let
where is the binomial coefficient. The substitution rules above are all united by the function which satisfies the rule
When and this reduces to , the rule for counting the number of vertices on an associahedron, but when it reduces to the rule . In general, the generating function takes the form
Note that the coefficients of the double series could only give the Schroeder numbers when , so by summing the diagonals of the table on page 4 (that is, summing the of weight , starting with for ) the Schroeder numbers are obtained. This proves that the Schroeder numbers are given by
which is a little nicer than the hypergeometric expression . By setting the coefficients are alternating sums of the and this leads to the sequence The Motzkin rule follows from setting and then working with , which one may verify by looking at the generating function. Can we generate more cute Abel sums using ?
where is the binomial coefficient. The substitution rules above are all united by the function which satisfies the rule
When and this reduces to , the rule for counting the number of vertices on an associahedron, but when it reduces to the rule . In general, the generating function takes the form
Note that the coefficients of the double series could only give the Schroeder numbers when , so by summing the diagonals of the table on page 4 (that is, summing the of weight , starting with for ) the Schroeder numbers are obtained. This proves that the Schroeder numbers are given by
which is a little nicer than the hypergeometric expression . By setting the coefficients are alternating sums of the and this leads to the sequence The Motzkin rule follows from setting and then working with , which one may verify by looking at the generating function. Can we generate more cute Abel sums using ?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home