Arcadian Functor

occasional meanderings in physics' brave new world

My Photo
Name:
Location: New Zealand

Marni D. Sheppeard

Monday, August 06, 2007

Blogrolling On III

Note that if we always set x=1, J(x,y) has a non-zero imaginary part when -1<y<3. If y=2, and thus z=2x, the coefficients take the form

Ci=2iSi

for the Schroeder numbers Si. Then J is a cubed root of unity ω, and the generating function corresponds to the rule

J=1+2J+J2

Can we prove a law J4=J? Similarly, if y=3 and J=-1 the rule would be J=1+3J+J2. Can we interpret these rules in terms of trees? Let's write the first rule as J=1+J+J+J2. This looks a lot like the Motzkin rule, except for the extra factor of J. What if we distinguished left and right branches for Motzkin trees? That is, take a full binary rooted tree template and count whole trees with 0, 1 or 2 branches that may be fitted to the template. Then the desired rule works by differentiating left and right unary branches from the root. Instead of a fivefold bijection of the set of Motzkin trees, there is now a fourfold mapping, and the series

1+4+24+176+1440+=ω

Motzkin numbers Mi are also given in terms of trinomial coefficients T(n,1). The T(n,0) coefficients go back to Euler. These are the number of permutations of n ternary symbols (-1, 0, or 1) which sum to 0. A general T(n,k) is the number of permutations of these symbols that sum to k.

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sure enough, the substitution rule J = 1 + 2J + J^2 results in an isomorphism J = J^4! It is essentially the same as in the Motzkin case: expand until you get to a J^5 term, then start collapsing terms with the lowest power of J. You seem to need an extra expansion at one point to "borrow" some powers of J. I want to think about this more after I get all these calculus tests graded...

August 07, 2007 4:07 PM  
Blogger Kea said...

Hi Matt! Good to see you here - and thanks for working through it. I'd also love to spend more time on this, because I'm sure its related to the physics we do here - but then there are so many things to do .....

August 07, 2007 4:23 PM  
Blogger Doug said...

Hi Kea,

The series 1 4 24 176 1440 can be found - intermixed - among a larger sequence of Sloane's A036912 'Maximum inverse of phi(n) increases' [author David W. Wilson].

http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/?q=1+4+24+176+1440&sort=0&fmt=0&language=english

[see the list and graph as well]

There does not appear to be any exact Sloane match for the shorter series.

I do not know if this is significant.

August 08, 2007 12:29 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home